Primark says it’s going to terminate family members with providers responsible of sure “transgressions” and people unwilling to make case study answer “essential changes” to their employment practices when breaches of its code are uncovered. Primark and Stakeholders Engagement Primark sacked case look at solution three providers earlier than being hit by a wave of terrible exposure unavoidably coming its way from case study answer documentary. The firm, owned by Associated British Foods, said it had made case look at answer statement to fulfil a obligation to shareholders, not – as cynics suggested – to lessen case examine answer shock of a global reveal. The retailer said that, as soon because it was alerted to case examine solution practices over a month ago by case study solution Observer and case study answer BBC it cancelled new orders with case look at answer factories involved and withdrew thousands of garments from its retail outlets. A assertion from Primark Stores on Bangladesh 19/11/2010 A Primark spokesman said: “Primark stocks and recognises a lot of case look at solution issues raised by No Sweat. We acknowledge that conditions for workers in some factories don’t forever meet them high criteria that we and other brands sourcing from these factories, predict.

Related